Spinal instability neoplastic score: an analysis of reliability and validity from the spine oncology study group.

نویسندگان

  • Daryl R Fourney
  • Evan M Frangou
  • Timothy C Ryken
  • Christian P Dipaola
  • Christopher I Shaffrey
  • Sigurd H Berven
  • Mark H Bilsky
  • James S Harrop
  • Michael G Fehlings
  • Stefano Boriani
  • Dean Chou
  • Meic H Schmidt
  • David W Polly
  • Roberto Biagini
  • Shane Burch
  • Mark B Dekutoski
  • Aruna Ganju
  • Peter C Gerszten
  • Ziya L Gokaslan
  • Michael W Groff
  • Norbert J Liebsch
  • Ehud Mendel
  • Scott H Okuno
  • Shreyaskumar Patel
  • Laurence D Rhines
  • Peter S Rose
  • Daniel M Sciubba
  • Narayan Sundaresan
  • Katsuro Tomita
  • Peter P Varga
  • Luiz R Vialle
  • Frank D Vrionis
  • Yoshiya Yamada
  • Charles G Fisher
چکیده

PURPOSE Standardized indications for treatment of tumor-related spinal instability are hampered by the lack of a valid and reliable classification system. The objective of this study was to determine the interobserver reliability, intraobserver reliability, and predictive validity of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS). METHODS Clinical and radiographic data from 30 patients with spinal tumors were classified as stable, potentially unstable, and unstable by members of the Spine Oncology Study Group. The median category for each patient case (consensus opinion) was used as the gold standard for predictive validity testing. On two occasions at least 6 weeks apart, each rater also scored each patient using SINS. Each total score was converted into a three-category data field, with 0 to 6 as stable, 7 to 12 as potentially unstable, and 13 to 18 as unstable. RESULTS The κ statistics for interobserver reliability were 0.790, 0.841, 0.244, 0.456, 0.462, and 0.492 for the fields of location, pain, bone quality, alignment, vertebral body collapse, and posterolateral involvement, respectively. The κ statistics for intraobserver reliability were 0.806, 0.859, 0.528, 0.614, 0.590, and 0.662 for the same respective fields. Intraclass correlation coefficients for inter- and intraobserver reliability of total SINS score were 0.846 (95% CI, 0.773 to 0.911) and 0.886 (95% CI, 0.868 to 0.902), respectively. The κ statistic for predictive validity was 0.712 (95% CI, 0.676 to 0.766). CONCLUSION SINS demonstrated near-perfect inter- and intraobserver reliability in determining three clinically relevant categories of stability. The sensitivity and specificity of SINS for potentially unstable or unstable lesions were 95.7% and 79.5%, respectively.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Reliability of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) among radiation oncologists: an assessment of instability secondary to spinal metastases

BACKGROUND The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) categorizes tumor related spinal instability. It has the potential to streamline the referral of patients with established or potential spinal instability to a spine surgeon. This study aims to define the inter- and intra-observer reliability and validity of SINS among radiation oncologists. METHODS Thirty-three radiation oncologists, ...

متن کامل

Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS): Reliability Among Spine Fellows and Resident Physicians in Orthopedic Surgery and Neurosurgery

Study Design Reliability analysis. Objectives The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) was developed for assessing patients with spinal neoplasia. It identifies patients who may benefit from surgical consultation or intervention. It also acts as a prognostic tool for surgical decision making. Reliability of SINS has been established for spine surgeons, radiologists, and radiation oncolo...

متن کامل

Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression: An Update of Best Practice

The Spine Instability Neoplastic Score SINS is a very important tool; it helps clinicians in identifying when patients with neoplastic disease of the spine should benefit from surgical consultation [2]. The treatment strategy algorithm of Paton et al. [3](LMNOP), evaluates the number of spinal Levels involved and the Location of disease in the spine (L), Mechanical instability (M), Neurology (N...

متن کامل

Incorporating the Spine Instability Neoplastic Score into a Treatment Strategy for Spinal Metastasis: LMNOP

Study Design Review. Objective To describe a decision framework that incorporates key factors to be considered for optimal treatment of spinal metastasis and highlight how this system incorporates the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS). Methods We describe how treatment options for spinal metastasis have broadened in recent years with advancements in stereotactic radiosurgery, vertebral...

متن کامل

Spinal neoplastic instability: biomechanics and current management options.

BACKGROUND Often the spine is afflicted from primary or metastatic neoplastic disease, which can lead to instability. Instability can cause deformity, pain, and spinal cord compression and is an indication for surgery. Although overt instability is uniformly agreed upon, it is sometimes difficult for specialists to agree on subtle degrees of instability due to lack of objective criteria. METH...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

دوره 29 22  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011